British folklore is a deep well, and poetry is one of the best buckets for drawing from it. Ballads, charms, and local legends offer ready-made rhythms, stark images, and moral puzzles. But turning them into poems that stand on their own is delicate work. Too much reverence and you get museum pieces; too little and you lose the old power. This survey looks at three recent collections that take different routes into the material: The Hollow Bone by Elspeth Marr, Charms for a Changing Year by Rhys Llewellyn, and The Green Man's Daughter by Nia Hopkins. We will consider imagery, rhythm, and how well each handles its sources.
Marr works mainly from border ballads and witch-trial records. Her imagery is cold and mineral: iron, thorn, salt, bone. She rarely decorates. In "The Lye", a charm for washing away a lover, the refrain "Nine knots, nine nights" echoes traditional counting charms without becoming a pastiche. Her rhythm is loose tetrameter, often broken by caesura, which gives the poems a stopped, wary quality. The best piece, "The Daemon Lover's Wife", retells a familiar ballad from the woman's point of view, using short lines that feel like someone speaking under their breath. Where Marr falters is when she treats source material as a quarry rather than a conversation: a few poems list folk motifs without letting them breathe. Still, her handling is bold, and her strongest work has a genuine eerie charge.
Llewellyn focuses on agricultural charms, Plough Monday, well dressing, and weather lore. His imagery is lush and earthy: wet soil, hawthorn blossom, rain on slate. The rhythm is hymnal, usually four beats to a line, often rhymed. He sets old charms into new contexts, so a charm against blight becomes a meditation on climate grief. This is respectful, almost conservative handling. He includes notes on sources, which helps readers see where he has borrowed and where he has invented. Practical strength: each poem is designed to be spoken aloud, and many work as actual charms. The weakness is a lack of wildness; some pieces feel like well-made museum labels. Best poems: "The Apple Tree Man" and "A Charm for the Lost".
Hopkins draws on local legends from the Welsh Marches: corpse candles, phantom funerals, the green man himself. Her imagery is mossy, antlered, and candle-lit. Rhythm is free verse, but sudden rhymes break through like a folk song surfacing in a conversation. She weaves source material into a personal narrative of a daughter's grief, which gives the collection its heat. In "Corpse Candle", she uses the belief that a light foretells a death, but she never explains it. She trusts the reader. The result is eerie and tender. Her weakness is occasional over-explanation in the endnotes, where the poem has already done the work. Best poems: "Corpse Candle" and "The Green Man's Daughter".
Compare the three approaches. Marr fractures and collages. Llewellyn preserves and frames. Hopkins dissolves and reimagines. All three avoid simple pastiche, which is harder than it sounds. The best moments come when the poet lets the old form do new work. Imagery: Marr is stark, Llewellyn is lush, Hopkins is liminal. Rhythm: Marr's is broken, Llewellyn's is steady, Hopkins's is syncopated. When you read these collections, keep an eye on the following:
Marr and Hopkins pass these tests more often than Llewellyn, but Llewellyn's clarity is its own virtue.
These are poems for the voice. Marr's best lines need a slow, deliberate delivery, with weight on the stressed syllables. Llewellyn's charms demand a rhythmic, almost chanting pace, and they benefit from being read in a group. Hopkins's legends reward a quiet, intimate reading, as if you were telling a story by candlelight. Practical tip: keep a note of the source material nearby, but let the poem lead. If you run a reading group, pair each collection with a local legend from your own area. Ask what the poet kept, what they changed, and why. None of these collections is perfect, but each offers a genuine engagement with British folklore. They remind us that ballads and charms are not dead artefacts. They are living rhythms, waiting to be spoken again.
Leave A Comment